Few ideas have fascinated me as much as one of the topics we discussed that day. One of my friends who have always been the prettiest in the group, doing fairly well academically told me that she was suspicious of her husband’s loyalty. Her husband, a popular personality in the media has gone abroad and will be staying there for a while and she was suspecting he might break the golden rule of any marriage. This was a love marriage were both of them knew each other for several years before the wedding and still is deeply in love with each other. Surprised I pondered on the topic and found out that another friend of mine also had the same feeling, that given the opportunity they think any man will cheat on his wife even if he is in love with the wife, possibly a one night’s stand I proposed. Unfortunately my friends disagreed, their claim was that every man wishes to have an extra marital affair, not all of them get a chance to do it but those who do will definitely go for it for an extended time even. Then my 1st friend lets me know she was skeptical about it even before she married her husband that he might at some point get involved with another woman romantically/physically and she sort of has thought of the steps she will take when such a thing occurs.
I was further informed by some other friends that they think most men never want to actually leave their wives, but they still fantasize about getting involved with another woman secretly and plan to come back to their wives after their little love affair without any strings attached. No matter how much you try to keep your husband and in laws happy this apparently is something inevitable! I was shocked to learn such an alarming concern lied in many middle class, upper middle class and upper class married women’s minds in such a modern time. Or was it because the time is too modern to have any principles left in our minds?
What I had noticed before in all classes of married women in Dhaka is the need to keep their husbands and in laws satisfied even if by doing things they wouldn’t otherwise. Most women being financially dependent on their husbands in the past it made sense for them to want to keep them happy as it is extremely difficult for any woman to maintain a decent and secure life in the city without an earning source. Even today’s modern women seem to be quite concerned about their husband’s satisfaction, all out of love or for some other reasons? As long as both the partners in a marriage are looking after each other’s needs and wants it is fine, but do we the women often give up on our wants just to maintain our spouse’s?
The issue of pleasing the male counterpart probably is an age old system but now I wonder was suspicions of disloyalty also there from long before? Did women want to keep their husbands happy only to assure that they won’t go outside for some romantic escape?

September 15th, 2008 at 4:42 pm
“I wonder was suspicions of disloyalty also there from long before?”
I don’t have historical data on this, however in “Shei Shomoy” by Sunil, the Jamindars seemed to do polygamy as a common practice. Recently saw an article in MSN that says, its in men’s gene:).
I would rather think in other direction, what are the secrets of couples that are having a happy long couple life? According to “Shesher Kobita” couples has to find their love for differnt reasons as their couple-ship grows, otherwsie it might face challenges (this is not an exact translation though, it was pretty much the idea as far I remember).
Marriage is a very special realtionship though it would be incorrect to assume there is 100% things in common between two ppl in a marriage, It would be intersting to hear about how ppl get along inspite of their differences. Most ppl find a common ground, love for their offsprings is a very common one I assume.
-Sharmin
September 18th, 2008 at 5:37 pm
Hmm… I am little disapponted to see no comments on this post.
Here is a realted intersting article from MSN
Can men and women be friends:
http://lifestyle.msn.com/relationships/articleoprahmatch.aspx?cp-documentid=9073643>1=32023
…
Things are different if you are married, Rabbi Shmuley says. It is possible to have an opposite sex friendship, but you cannot compromise certain borders:
You can’t go out to late night dinners together. You can have lunch together in a public place, but you should not order alcoholic beverages. “The embers of attraction really can grow in situations like that, and suddenly it’s not so innocent, it’s not just friendship anymore,” Rabbi Shmuley says.
You can’t take long drives or long flights with the other person, even if it’s for work. “Even if you have to work with a colleague [of the opposite sex], there are still certain boundaries you need to preserve,” he says.
You cannot place yourself in any situation where romance can grow. “Romance grows when people are alone; romance grows when people tell secrets,” Rabbi Shmuley says.
You can’t share secrets with a platonic male or female friend that you don’t share with your spouse. “Because then you’re sharing an exclusivity with a member of the opposite sex that you’re not with your partner, and that can lead to a big no-no,” he says.
What do our readers think?
-Sharmin
September 19th, 2008 at 1:22 pm
Very interesting topic!
I dont know how many women try..or wish to keep their husband and in-laws happy by doing things, including some, that they wouldnt otherwise do….
But i am aware the number is very large.
In every kind of relationship we do things to keep others happy to some extent or the other. Like we dont play the music loud ( cause mommy dearest will lose it…..dont leave the table untidy cause daddydearest will not like it etc etc) ..however in the in-law situation in Bangladesh…we all live a kind of artificial life.
Its i guess all for the sake of peaceful coexistence.
However, there is (AND SHOULD BE) always a line..
My ma-in-law has taken a real dislike to me because i dont do half the things she “expects/wishes/dreams” of me doing. This include stuff as what she things not a son but a “BOU” should do….including running her very personal errands.
On my hand i have stopped being irritated by her as i have realised she is just a person from another time or planet, with all due respect.
How can i agree with her when she thinks doing the hard stuff like cooking/washing/housekeeping/caring is the “GIRL’S” job and not the sons …while all the better things like “pursuing one;s hobby or dreams” is a son’s privilege…and cant be extended to the daughter-in-law!
Ofcourse it CAn be extended to the daughter’s perhaps….
I dont even talk to her about it anymore. Though i do suffer a pang, that unlike a friend in my mother, i have non in my ma-in-law.
However, these thoughts and situations make me search all around me for other signs of this in the society..am i the ONLY one that suffers? Am i the ONLY one that complains..i wonder….cause talking about in-law problems though the most prevelant topic of discussion in Bangladesh, is never the less non-existence on paper. On records. In History. And in the fashionable reality of live we live on the face of it ( meaning the face we show to society, friends and relatives)
Our newspapers and magazines are so REAL that they never talk about in-law problems or situations..Stories if published (IF-ever that is) focus on good stories, positive case studies etc etc….
O, i have missed one point…. Its like society as a whole BEHAVES as if ONLY THE POOR HAVE IN-LAW problems (espe mothr-in-law ones) and not the middle class ( who aspire to be pretencious ) and the elite, who in general are pretencious!
Was that a biased thing to say ?? not at all..for with the exception of EXCEPTIONS…thats the kid of life we mostly need. Everyone tries to pretend/feign a life that dont exist.
and in the middle class /upper middle class and the upper clases we NEVER admit problems, expecially houshold ones.
In ther words, people almost seem to be ashamed to reveal that there ARE problems…
We live such a “make-beleive” life that I cant even begin to say how tired i am of it.
I read what Rabbi Shmuley says …..I would LOVE TO THINK it has to be ALWAYS applied to MEN IN BANGLADESGH hehehe because men in bangladesh ( in general again) have NO CONTROL over their actions…..under the influence of alcohol or else!
However i am not so biased in my beleifs and practices, but thinking prudently..i would practise many of these in bangladesh. It might sound very crude to say this but people here, have so little education about relationship etiqettes and ethics, that they dont know what the boundaries are most of the time.
OK..I may be posting this reponse to the wrng link….Shahnaz help!!!